Showing posts with label Big Sky Conference. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Big Sky Conference. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Refs: Can't Live with 'Em, Can't Kill 'Em


Like most lifelong basketball fans, I grew up being a ref baiter. I gathered with my friends in junior high school, screamed childish taunts and embarrassed the heck out of my parents. I came from a high school where basketball was a town-wide ritual on winter weekends, and we developed a very creative student section. If we weren't picking on specific players from the opposing teams, we were working over the officals -- all of whom we knew by name, of course.

Then it was off to Northwestern where the athletics were terrible, so making fun of other teams' athletes -- and the officials -- was really the only relief. The older we got, the more clever the taunts became, of course. At least, that's what we thought.

When I became a sportswriter, all "taunting" was over, but when I switched to news reporting, I was back in my seat at Holt Arena, giving the stripes what-for. I've managed to embarrass two wives during that time, and I dare say, I'm not alone. Next time you're in Holt or Reed for a men's basketball game, watch how many men are red in the face from screaming at an official -- and how many of their wives are red in the face from embarrassment.

I've observed a number of different coaches work the officials over the years, too, and they all have their different approaches. I'm told that Vergil Fletcher, who won two Illinois state championships and over 700 games at my high school, was a real ref baiter in his younger days. By the time I saw him, in his 50s and 60s, he never said anything to the officials. He did his best John Wooden imitation -- sitting quietly on the bench with a rolled-up program in his hand, occasionally pointing out an instruction or two during play, but essentially leaving the players -- and the officials -- alone, at least until there was a time-out.

I also sat behind the Indiana bench when the soon-to-be undefeated national champions beat Northwestern in 1976 and listened while Bob Knight turned the air blue with epithets -- some at his own players, many at the men in stripes.

As an announcer, I've had to battle my demons. The Big Sky usually issues friendly notices once or twice a year to the league announcers, reminding us that we're not supposed to criticize officials. When I first started working Idaho State games in 1994, I still spent a lot of time squeeling about officials' calls and, every once in a while, my broadcast partner Jim Fox would have to remind me to shut up. Of course, Jim was a big homer, too, and he got his hand slapped more than once by the league. I got more than a few comments during those days from former Bengal offensive lineman Kent Marboe, who went on to be a prominent high school official in Idaho Falls, imploring me to "lay off the officials."

Russ Eisenstein, my play-by-play partner a couple of seasons ago, was adamant about not ref-baiting. He felt it was unprofessional and detracted from the broadcast. I have to admit he's probably right, especially judging from the amount of criticism I read on other team's message boards about the "home announcers" whose feeds are used for Big Sky TV. But at times I can't help being swept away in the emotion of a hard-fought game, and I will always be a homer at heart.

I guess I can't say much has changed in basketball in my four-plus decades of watching it as a fan, sportswriter and sportscaster. Men and boys still scream, women still cringe, and the officials still get an occasional call or two wrong. In the Big Sky Conference, you might be led to believe they get a lot of calls wrong. You can go on most any fan web site in the Big Sky and see threads like this one on the Weber State board, authored by a Northern Colorado fan: "Big Sky Refs...Are They the Worst?"

Frankly, I doubt it, but then how do you measure such things? One thing I do know is that many "Big Sky officials" aren't just Big Sky officials. In fact, if you go to a cool little web site entitled Stat Sheet.com, select Big Sky Conference and click on the refs tab, you'll get a listing of the most active officials employed by the league. If you click on the names of those officials, you'll see the other conferences that also employ them: principally, the PAC 10, West Coast, Mountain West and Western Athletic Conferences. You'll see, for example, that ten of the 14 most active Big Sky officials work in other leagues. Probably the two busiest are Chris Rastatter, who also works PAC 10 and Mountain West games, and Michael Greenstein, who refs in the West Coast and PAC 10.

Why is this important? Well, for one it illustrates that no league "owns" its officials. They are independent contractors who cut their own officiating deals on a game-by-game basis. I don't know this for a fact, but I wouldn't be surprised if some entry-level Big Sky officials are also working community college or lower division games while they try to earn their "stripes" (pardon the pun) in the big leagues. I do know that three Big Sky men's officials also work women's games for the league: Bob Scofield, Ty Elkin and John Weeks.

Yes, the Big Sky Conference does have a coordinator of basketball officials, Marla Denham, who is based in the Phoenix area, and she is charged with overseeing the assignments, training and assessment of officials who work Big Sky games. She got to recommend to Big Sky commissioner Doug Fullerton, for example, that he suspend former Big Sky official Eric Curry a couple of seasons ago, when Curry made his famous "non-call" on what should have been a technical foul against a Montana player for signalling a time-out the team did not have.

Of course, Curry's "suspension" from Big Sky games meant little to him in the grand scheme of things. He continued to work for other conferences, got an NCAA tournament assignment that year, and has now moved on to "bigger and better things," working for the Mountain West and Big Ten conferences. And Curry's particular situation points out how difficult it is for a league like the Big Sky Conference to manage its officiating crews.

The best officials, and despite his gaffe, I did consider Curry to be one of the best in the Big Sky, move on to more lucrative assignments in more prestigious conferences. For example, Pocatello's Scott Thornley, who has worked several Final Fours, used to work in the Big Sky Conference in his younger days, but he's doing only Big 12, WAC and Mountain West games now. When I checked the Stats Inc. PAC 10 officials listing, I found a total of a dozen refs there who at one time worked in the Big Sky. Of that 12, only Ratstatter and Greenstein still take Big Sky assignments. If they continue to improve and move up the seniority ladder, there may well come a time when they will stop taking Denham's phone calls, as well.

Bottom line is that when it comes to officiating (much like it is with coaching), the Big Sky is a developmental conference. It is taking young officials on the way up, mid-career officials on the way out, and older officials on the way down, and trying to meld them all into cohesive crews that work together and enforce a relatively similar style of play. Good luck with that.

As hard as it may be to make that work, nobody is offering Denham or her officials any sympathy. That would be un-American, kinda like thanking a homeplate umpire for working hard after he called you out on a borderline pitch with the bases loaded and two outs in the ninth inning. It just ain't happenin'. But I will admit that after reading this ESPN story that followed well-known referee Tim Higgins around the East Coast for a few days, I was almost willing to acknowledge that officials are people too. Almost...

Warning: Old Guy Reminiscence

Mark Liptak, my broadcast partner on ISU women's games, sent me a remarkable link the other day, to a college basketball game played a generation (mine) ago. It marked the 40th anniversary of the LSU-Kentucky game in which Dan Issel (55) and "Pistol Pete" Maravich (64) combined for 119 points in one game. Kentucky won the game, 121-105, but that was secondary to the show Maravich and Issel put on for the fans.

Tom Parker, who was from my high school, played for Kentucky in that game (pauper: he had a mere 18 points and 11 rebounds), and I remember watching it in my living room at home with my brother. The early 1970s were great days for young college basketball fans. The UCLA dynasty was at its height, scoring was at a premium and defense, well defense could be a rare commodity in those days. It was a time of great individual scorers like Maravich (who averaged over 40 points a game during his three-year career), Austin Carr, Travis "Machine Gun" Grant, Freeman Williams, Dwight "Bo" Lamar, and William "Bird" Averitt.

Keep all of that in mind as you watch this ten minutes of soundless video. It was a different game in those days. One thing you'll notice right away is that neither LSU nor Kentucky had any players of color -- nothing but white guys, even in 1970. It wouldn't be until an African-American 7-footer named Tom Payne joined the Wildcats a season later that Kentucky's team would be integrated. Collis Temple was LSU's first African-American basketball player, joining the Tigers the same season as Payne debuted. The Southeastern Conference didn't really begin to fully embrace African-American athletes until the late 1970s.

The other thing you will notice from the video is the emphasis on one-on-one offensive play and the lack of double-teaming and help-side defense. Even though I think of this game as having been played in my modern era of basketball, it really was the dark ages for defense.

Finally, I'll use this as one more platform for pushing for Idaho State's Hall of Fame board to do the right thing and welcome former Bengal great Willie Humes into the hall at its induction ceremonies next fall. Many of you remember my shock when I discovered around this time last year that Humes, who is ISU's all-time career scoring average leader (31.5 points a game) and still ranked No. 10 on NCAA career scoring charts, is not in the ISU Athletic Hall of Fame. I asked if anybody knew where Willie is these days, and some fans e-mailed me links suggesting he is still coaching girls basketball in Columbus, Ind.

When I asked former long-time ISU Sports Information Director Glenn Alford why Humes was not in the Hall of Fame, he said "no one has nominated him." He also noted cryptically that Willie's shot attempts were rather high, and his shooting percentage comparatively low. I get all that, but as you can see from the Issel-Maravich video, that's how college basketball was played in most places east of Westwood in those days. Even if Humes was an unrepentant gunner, I think he's paid for his sins and its time for him to be duly recognized as one of the greatest offensive players in Idaho State history.

By the way, after being told that "no one nominated" Willie last year, I sent a letter to the Hall of Fame committee so nominating him. A couple of months later, I get a letter back saying my nomination was "too late" for that year's class, but they would reconsider him next year. Well, next year is here, folks, and Willie ain't gettin' any younger. Let's do the right thing and bring him back to Pocatello nearly 40 years after he put up over 50 points in a single game on both Montana State and Northern Arizona. I don't care how many shots he put up -- nobody's done it since.

Tidbits

College basketball attendance is suffering around the Big Sky Conference, and the University of Montana is no exception. The Griz, who derive a significant amount of revenue from their women's program, are going through an uncharacteristically mediocre year this season and that, plus the flagging economy, is hitting Montana right in the wallet. UM Athletic Director Jim O'Day cites tough times and what I think is really the root of attendance decline, simply too much basketball on television. When a storied program like Iowa's is drawing fewer than 5,000 fans a game to watch Big Ten basketball, folks have to start asking some questions about how advisable it is to continue to develop new networks and outlets for watching basketball on television....It appears the Big Sky connection to Washington State's athletic program may continue, with the announcement last week that Wazzu has offered its open athletic director's job to former Montana AD Bill Moos. A highly successful AD at Oregon for many years before running afoul of Nike Chairman Phil Knight, Moos has been farming and ranching near Pullman while living off a fat contract settlement from the University of Swoosh. Moos hasn't announced if he'll accept the job yet, but was interested enough to visit campus last week. He would replace another Big Sky expatriat, former Portland State AD Jim Sterk, who is leaving for San Diego State....Sterk, by the way, gets the quote of the day honor with this discussion of how nearly all athletic directors live out their usefulness in time: "I said in an interview in San Diego that AD years are like dog years," Sterk said. "You have to make decisions based on what you think is right for the program and some people may, or may not, disagree. Over time, that may build up with some folks." PS: AD years are strikingly similar to politician, university president or head coaching years.

--Brad B.

Friday, May 22, 2009

And now for a different view....


Well, it seems there are plenty of folks with plenty of things to say about the new cost cutting measures of the Big Sky Conference...Kellis Robinett of the Idaho State Journal had a regular article that is pretty straight forward, but he takes a few potshots at the Big Sky in his blog. Seton Sobolewski wasn't available for the article as he honeymooning in Costa Rica, but there is no truth that he actual is down there for the taping of this, although that would be totally awesome. The Missoulian didn't get into it all that much, by Skylar Archibald in Portland brings up a tremendously valid point, one I'll get to in a minute, in his Vanguard Blog. There was also news from Jason Asay in Ogden. All of this overshadowed the women's basketball news for ISU and the new Friday-Saturday showcase of dueling Ashleys/Ashleighs/Ashlees (your pick).

But for a moment, let me break down some of the changes made, and some of the implications they might have, not just on ISU, but other schools....it's pretty interesting.

The biggest thing is the Friday/Saturday scheduling for basketball. I'm glad the conference is talking about the saving of money, and yes, it should save a little, but how much is really negligible (the reduction of travel parties does that). However, I keep hearing about all the classtime that is saved by doing this. I looked at ISU's men's and women's schedules....wanna guess how much class time the men save? Two days. They will save one day before the Montana State trip, and one before the Portland State trip. Wow....two whole days, but it gets better. ISU's women save....wait for it....one. Yep, one. They will save Wednesday, January 21. They get to go to class that day....that's it. All the back-to-backs for that.

My issue isn't even that...I mean, the issue is the competitive disadvantage, right? It's harder to win on the road, right? Honestly, I don't know if it is or if it isn't, but here's where my problem is. The Big Sky uses the "lone wolf" schedule, in which since there are nine teams, eight are paired as travel partners (ISU and WSU, NAU and NCOL, UM and MSU, PSU and EWU) and Sacramento State is the lone wolf, so they play the travel partners on a weekend (they would ISU and WSU on the same weekend, and host the same two on a weekend).

The question is does the lone wolf bear a huge brunt here? The week ISU plays SAC, that's their only game, which would mean that on January 30, when ISU has a week to prep for the Hornets, Sacramento State has to play at Weber State on Friday night. Thank you Big Sky for that one, but Sacramento State can't be thrilled about that at all.

Also, ISU's women were scheduled to play at Montana on December 31 (Thursday) and at MSU on Saturday, January 2. Well, Montana didn't want to host that day, so we moved the game at Montana to Monday, January 4. Do we now have to move it again to January 1? We have signatures from everyone, including the league office, but does this new rule mean that schedule change is null-and-void? There are so many questions....

Also, speaking of the schedule, while it isn't official yet, ISU has a horribly bad break. ISU hosts traditional rivals and big crowd getters Montana and Montana State on January 1 and January 3. Originally the games were Thursday December 31 and Saturday January 2. However, the new scheduling change means ISU has to host Montana on January 1. That'll go over well....and then because it sounds like Montana State might be ISU's Altitude game, that will be January 3. ISU will definitely take a ticket hit, one that the $10,000 Altitude hosting fee might or might not help. Again, it sounds like Weber State is refusing to host a Sunday game, stating the large LDS influence in Ogden and that it would be tough to get folks to work at the contests (concessions, ticket takers, etc.). ISU does get to host Weber State on a Saturday night this year with out a Thursday game in front of it, so that's a nice change.

Weber State also refuses to host soccer games on Sundays, which is why ISU gets a bunch of Saturday games in different years, although it doesn't affect ISU at all next year.

Anyways, the Friday/Saturday thing isn't horrid for ISU, although that ruling, coupled with the reduction of the travel party to 17 members, means it's really tough now for road teams. The radio/TV/video folks don't count against the number, but here is what you are left with....

One head coach
Three assistant coaches
One trainer
12 players

Yes, men's basketball had 13 scholarship players, and women's basketball has 15. Now, if you know you are going to be maybe that 13th guy....you going to school there? Maybe not, right? Now, you are playing Friday/Saturday ... can't bring a manager at all. Sports information guy? Nope, he's out too. Director of Operations? Nope, he stays at home, despite the fact he handles the hotel and money and tickets on the road. For ISU, this is devastating, as in the past, the four coaches wouldn't go with the team to pregame meal, instead going over last minute planning and adjustments. So, either Tom the trainer is now in charge of the money (like Phil Luckey was back in the 1970s ... is the Dharma Initiative coming back too?) or an assistant coach will have to go.

The issue with the travel restriction is it just seems like the institution should be able to make this decision. I mean here is the funny thing...say Jeff Tingey needed to accompany the team on a road trip. He can't. Well, he can, but up to the Montana's, he can't get on the bus. He can't get meal money. He can't be a part of the team. He has to drive separately (which is an expense), stay separate from the team (expense), and eat separate (ditto). I can't go.

The other bad part of this is just playing Friday and Saturday...I mean, the trainers, myself, people that work at the games, we sort of like having a Friday night where I can see my family....catch a movie, something like that. Well, thanks for taking those away....my wife was thrilled, and I'm sure all the volunteer workers and folks who make minimum wage working the events were thrilled at losing six Fridays during January and February. No one thought of that one.

The other thing is the plane fare deal. Now, the new rule is if a trip is under 450 miles, air travel is prohibited...on problem. How is 450 miles defined? ISU to Cheney is more than 450...no problem. ISU to Portland State is more than 450...again, no problem. Portland to Cheney however is 338 miles. Portland State and Eastern have to drive to each other, but does ISU have to drive to Cheney from Portland? We have always flown it, but does that 450 figure mean everyone is busing that? Let's figure that one out.

This year's men's game at PSU on Feb. 26 ends at 9:00 pm or so. Now, you can shower, eat pizza on the bus, and ddrive to Cheney, putting you there at 4:00 am or so, sleeping on the bus, or you can go back to the hotel, leave at like 8:00 am, and get to Cheney around 2:00 pm. Well, you have to go to Spokane to stay anywhere comfortable and have some food options and be near the airport for the flight back, so you get there at 2:30 pm. After checking in and everything, it's probably 3:00 pm when you go to eat pregame, and 3:30 when the food starts showing and you start eating. Then it's back to the hotel for a little bit to get taped, and then off to the arena. I just don't see how that's conducive to basketball, but I can come back the other way too, in that when I traveled last year, I was usually OK on the Friday travel day...it was Saturday that I dragged a bit, so maybe it won't be as bad as most folks think. Sure, NBA guys play back-to-back, but they have charted flights, five-star hotels, and you know, "people". Oh, and a paycheck....a big giant paycheck....don't forget that one.

Of course, you have to be at an airport minimum two hours early nowadays, so it's almost as bad flying, and what if there is a delay anywhere? ISU had so many flight delays last year I lost count. Now, the bigger issue is the fact that when those two teams come to play ISU and WSU, it's a piece of cake. Game ends for PSU at Weber State at 9:00 pm. Well, they get pizza, and are on the road at 9:45 pm, and they can be in Pocatello, into their rooms at 11:30 pm. They get a great night's sleep, and they have no travel at all. None. So, who has it tougher....ISU and WSU at home, or Portland State and Eastern at home? Doesn't take Ken Jennings to figure out that Friday-Saturday makes the ISU/WSU road trip the easiest one of all, unless we can convince the weather people to seed the clouds just right to shut the Malad Pass down.

I understand the saving of money, and I get the whole thing, but the conference said this will save about $415,000, so divide that by nine, and the average savings per school is $46,111. Is it worth that? Is all of this headache...the extra travel, playing on Fridays trying to get folks to go to back-to-back games, dissing the ISU, MSU, and NAU track programs (it's a little tougher to have meets when there's a basketball game going on) ... all this for $46,111. I personally struggle to see it.

Sadly, everyone, Kellis especially, harps on the Big Sky Conference office, but it wasn't the conference office that did this, and it was done by majority vote, so it is the majority will of the league to try this out again, and really, sometimes you have to try things, so I'm honestly OK with it as long as it gets reevaluated.

I did have someone mention that, if this was tried before and rescinded after one year, why try it again? Well, look at the A.D.s in the league now compared to then....they have all changed over. Every single one of them from that 2001-02 season when the change was made. Terry Wanless has been at Sacramento State since May of 2002, right when they went back to the old way of doing things. Only Mike Adras on the men's side and Carla Taylor and Robin Selvig on the women's side have been around from the first Friday-Saturday experiment, so couple all those new folks, and I can see how they are giving this a try. You have the give the league presidents and leaders kudos for trying things and experimenting with things, and seeing where things can go in an effort to streamline things.

I was glad they kept the basketball tournaments at six teams, because of the implication of the playoff chase on attendance, and I feel for the volleyball teams and tennis teams that saw their tourneys downsized a bit, but in reality, those tournaments don't make money, and the basketball programs can and frequently do, so I get that as well.

There were also some travel restrictions in football (basically chopping the road team down two members to 54), and in reality, basketball teams can get away with 12 players on the road. Honestly, how often do 13 players play? Only in blowouts (think Tom Taylor for ISU...he'd have been that 13th guy most likely last year), so you can survive, but it's just a rough thing to have to leave a kid home. I can't imagine who stays home from trips this year.

Much like a recruiting class, this can't be deciphered until we see it in action, and the potential is there for this to make things in basketball very exciting. It certainly makes road wins hard to come by, and more coveted than ever. Time will tell.

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Big Sky Cost-Savings Initiatives Begin

The Big Sky Conference announced two cost savings initiatives today, with more apparently on the way following conference meetings in May. The conference announced it is canceling its annual football Summer Kickoff in Park City, Utah, a gathering of coaches, league officials and the media that has been an institution for 25 years.

The Big Sky also announced that league volleyball matches will be played on a Friday-Saturday format (with the exception of trips that include Northern Arizona), a change from the current Thursday-Saturday set-up, and a likely foreshadowing of the conference moving men's and women's basketball to Friday-Saturday schedules. That, along with several other cost-savings proposals, will be voted on at the league's spring meetings May 18-20 in Salt Lake City.

Also expected to be adopted during those meetings are reductions in the number of teams that make the postseason men's and women's basketball tournaments, from 6 to 4; an elimination of the post-season conference soccer tournament; and a reduction in the traveling parties for basketball teams.

Editor's (Frank's) Note: Just a couple of added things here. While volleyball is moving to Friday-Saturday, men's and women's basketball will not change from Thursday-Saturday at this time. Also, while all of those things are options at the May 18-20 meetings, saying that those things are expected to be adopted is probably inaccurate. They might very well be adopted, but I don't think it's a given, based on the things that I'm hearing. It'll be interesting for sure.

Thanks Frank, you are certainly closer to the "pulse" than I. We shall all stay tuned.--BB

--Brad B.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Credit Issues....


No, this won't be about the economy (although how long would that post be?). I would like that thank the government though, as I'll apparently be working at Idaho State for the next 45 years in order to retire, since you can't buy a house anymore or move, so I'm guessing I will see some more titles won LOL.

However, this is about credit. Credit as in thanks to the Journal for giving the players and the coaching staff some credit for this week. Boo however to Dave Coulson of the Sports Network. Dave's column contains this....

"Eastern Washington (3-2) struggled for three quarters against Idaho State before pulling away with a couple of fourth-quarter scores in a performance similar to its win against Western Washington the previous week." Yeah, that's it....Eastern STRUGGLED....it couldn't be that Idaho State isn't all that bad, could it? Nah....has to be that Eastern struggled. You know how folks always go on and say things like "they are the best 0-4 team in the country?" ... well, I think we actually fit that mold.

This week should be really interesting. Say this for last week's defense...they did make some plays. They gave some up, but for the first time this year, they made some...forced a fumble in the fourth quarter on a sure touchdown (and if you watch the replay, it kind of was actually a touchdown), and picked off a pass to set up a score. Also, the defensive backs knocked passes down, and generally made some pretty nice plays. That was a big, big positive.

Football love
Dan Thompson showed a little love to the defense in his postgame blog, although the comment #5 afterwards by "pokeyfan" might be the most ill-informed internet post I've seen in a while. Give someone access to a computer and an anonymous handle, and they can get pretty brave.

Yes Kellis, They Sure Do....
You know, Kellis put this really well. I haven't heard much of anything to this point about the last two men's basketball games being moved out of Holt Arena and into Reed Gym. Personally, I hate because my office is in Holt...if I forget a pencil, well, it's a pretty short walk. I also hate it for the fans because of the inconvenience, but here's hoping that this is what helps push Bengal Village into the forefront more, if that's even possible with Jay McMillin's promotion to Assistant A.D. for Major Gifts and working with the ISU Foundation to meet with prospective donors. O.K., it is possible, but hey, feet are moving.

But seriously, after the town said nope, we don't need Holt Arena (and I don't care how you interpreted the vote back when it happened, but that's what folks sort of said), I personally thought that kicking out the wrestling tournament would have basically proven the point. Instead, we are gonna have wrestling here (and my own personal loathing of the high school wrestling tournament will have to deal I guess), and basketball there, so the town will benefit at athletics' expense. Seriously, I hope the town sees the sacrifice.

If folks think I'm biased against wrestlers by the way, it has nothing more to do then the weigh-in area is always in front of my door, so I have to hear and see wrestlers in their jockstraps all day long fretting about losing a pound or two. Really, we should all be so lucky to have that at work.

Don't I Wish
This would really have been an upset, huh?

A Little Cross Country Love
What happens when you crash into a tripwire at Holt Arena? You get featured on the ISU website. Mitch Worthington's 10-minute chats with the athletes are quickly becoming must reads, and his interview with Ryan Davis of the cross country team is hilarious and brilliant...you have to read that if you do nothing else today.

Big Sky Thoughts From the Weekend
From soccer to volleyball to how the Players of the Week in football were picked, Jon Kasper of the Big Sky wrote it all down. Well, typed it anyways.